Warhead
President Bush claimed on Tuesday he has not one, but four constituencies he listens to.
One of them is us, the People. The ones who, kinda-sorta, voted him into office. The ones he kinda-sorta represents as the President of the
His second constituency, he tells us, is the Enemy. The terrists. The ones who didn’t vote him into office, but sure are glad we kinda-sorta did. What a windfall that was!
The third constituency, Bush says, is the democratically elected (under duress, and with their country occupied by a Western nation run by a lunatic) Iraqi Government.
Yes, that would be the same Iraqi government that today helplessly observes (and, if the rumors are right about the Interior Minister and President Malaki’s association with the militias) observes and assists
The fourth constituency to whom Bush claims he lends his ear is the Military.
For the record: A constituency is a body of voters or residents of a district represented by an elected legislator or official. It can be a group of patrons or supporters, too, or to a clientele, a group served by an organization or institution.
Bush can certainly claim the American people and the American military as constituencies. Since he forced it into halting, reluctant existence, I can almost go with the Iraqi government as a Bush constituency.
But the enemy? Bush represents
On November 7, Bush’s primary and very real constituency, the American people, told him clearly that we were very, very unhappy with him and the Republican Party operatives that enable him. After four years, 2,950 American soldiers, and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis slaughtered, We the People finally comprehended what a tragic, preposterous mess he’s made of his baseless war in
But we’re stuck with him.
In reality, there’s just one constituency that George W. Bush listens to: the one that exists only between his own ears. When he refers to the American people as wanting to win in Iraq, he’s actually referring to his personal, inner constituency, a dark, roiling, fantasy mix of God, “gut” and oh, yes, guilt.
The only one who can hear that particular constituency is George, though there are monsters working for him who claim they can hear it too, and add to it their low whispers. Bush’s inner constituency drowns out all the others except the amorphous but hydra-headed enemy, which serves as a convenient reason d’etre and will be around in one form or another forever. Perfect.
He listens to his inner constituency to the exclusion of all the others.
The most recent polls tell us that 71 percent of Americans want American soldiers out of
The military – the ones that Bush says he listens to so carefully – are saying that they don’t want more forces in
But his voice was drowned out by Bush’s inner constituency – God, gut and guilt. Instead of drawing down forces in
He’s talking about increasing forces in Iraq, from 15,000 to 60,000 more, depending on which day it is. He claims he hasn’t made a decision yet, but his friend Gen. Casey, one of those who can “hear” Bush’s inner constituency, appears to think this might work. And we all know what George really means when he says he hasn’t made up his mind or that he’s still open to discussion.
It means his mind is made up and there will be no more talk.
As it was in March, 2003, when he started the war in
Increasing the boots on the ground in
The money cost of this war is astronomical, and it’s on borrowed cash and borrowed time. Yet once again, Bush tells us to be happy, go shopping.
At no time in
1 comment:
I've noticed a growing egotistical side to Bush lately, when he makes statements that seem to claim that he is "the decider." Fine. He's the top dog, I get it. But that doesn't give you a license to do as you please. The top position of power in the world requires close analysis, intelligence and sound advisers - none of which I fear our president has.
With the new push for a strategy in Iraq, I hear Bush saying things that sound more like the words of an emperor than a democratically elected/representative leader with a term limit. At which point does he decide to eliminate one of those constituencies you point out - namely, the people (of course it will be in the name of "security"). I would hardly be surprised to hear that his future decisions are based on "classified intelligence" and that he is making decisions that "may not seem like the best" to us poor shmucks, but he'll assure us that "he's looking out for our best interets."
It all started with sliding the Constitution under the doormat. After that, he has no respect for anything...
OK, I'm rambling. Enough said. But a great post on the connections between the extremists on both sides of the conflict.
Post a Comment